The Next French Revolution – Is it Beginning? | Armstrong Economics

The austerity measures of the EU are having a profound impact in Europe. In Paris of December 1st, 2018 (right on time with our volatility models for December) there was a major civil uprising, the worst France has witnessed in recent decades. Yellow Vests have converged in Paris to protest high living costs or in other words – a TAX RIOT. Rioters ran across central Paris torching cars and buildings, looting shops, smashing windows and clashing with police. The French President, Emmanuel Macron, was in Argentina for a G20 summit and said he called an emergency meeting on Sunday when he would return. Jeanne d’Hauteserre, the mayor of Paris’ 8th district, near the Arc de Triomphe, came out and told the press: “We are in a state of insurrection, I’ve never seen anything like it.” This has followed what was billed as a violent protest two weeks before of nationwide against fuel taxes and living costs. This tax rebellion is known as the “Yellow Vest” movement after fluorescent jackets kept in all vehicles in France. Politicians simply never learn. This is not just the youth. This is the older generations as well. Revolutions come become of taxes and corruption. The famous saying of Marie Antoinette “Let them eat cake” was the popular slogan during the French Revolution. There is no evidence that she ever actually said those words. Still, it inspired a revolution. The “cake” was not a desert, but it was a term that referred to the crust of the pâté which was left over. It certainly seems that the EU politicians are making the very same mistake. With that callous remark that was attributed to her, the Queen of France became the most hated symbol of the decadent monarchy and fueled the revolution that would cause her to (literally) lose her head several years later. In Paris, the police fired stun grenades, tear gas and water cannon at protesters on the tourist street known as the Champs-Elysees boulevard. The police said they had arrested almost 300 people while 110 were injured, including 20 members of the security forces. As a consequence, there are now parts of the city of Paris completely void of police as there was a shortage to defend the entire city. This has resulted in groups of masked men roaming and looting through its fanciest shopping districts, smashing the windows of designer boutiques. We can easily be witnessing the start of the next French Revolution. Our model for civil unrest interesting turned up in France on February 18th, 2013. The year before on May 6th, 2012, François Hollande was elected as the new president of France. While he may go down as perhaps the worst president in French history, on May 5th, 2013 is when the protests in Paris began. That first protest numbered in the tens of thousands marking the rising discontent with the Socialist François Hollande after just one year in power. Even the many supporters of leftist parties expressed dissatisfaction over his handling of the economy. Ever since the civil unrest began on May 5th, 2013, there has been a building on economic tension within France. The lack of economic growth has plagued France and Europe as a whole. The French share market peaked in 2000 and has been unable to elect ANY Yearly Bullish Reversals to date and 2018 appears to be no different for this year’s closing. This latest series of popular rebellions erupted on November 17th, 2018 and has spread quickly via social media, with protesters blocking roads across France and impeding access to shopping malls, factories, and some fuel depots. The gather at the Arc de Triomphe, chanting “Macron Resign” and writing graffiti on the Arch itself: “The yellow vests will triumph.” Macron held a news conference in Buenos Aires where he said that there was no cause justified the looting of stores, attacking the security forces, or torching of property. Macron totally fails to comprehend that the violence is building frustration that historically is necessary to mature into a revolution. This is not a political movement. This is economically driven. The police said that violent far-right and far-left groups had infiltrated the yellow vests movement in a desperate effort to call them extremists. These protests began as a backlash against Macron’s fuel tax hikes, but have tapped into a growing resentment that all people get are higher taxes and lower standards of living. While the protests appear to have caught Macron off-guard despite the fact that his poll rating is now down to 20%, like François Hollande, Macron is unrepenting and unyielding. He said he would not change his policy because of the protests of “thugs”. This only fuels the angry response that he is also out of touch with ordinary people, particularly in rural villages and the provincial hinterlands. There were people with signs reading “Macron, stop treating us like idiots!” Macron is inspiring real hatred as did Hillary Clinton when she called 50% of the country who voted for Trump the “deplorables!” Macron may call them “thugs” but the “Yellow Vests” have widespread public support, even in cities. The vast majority of French people were fed up with Macron. You can see the anger is escalating more and more throughout France, according to my sources there, and Macron is as unyielding as was Hollande. Some say that Macron had written a book called Revolution. He obviously failed to understand what really makes a revolution – TAXES.
— Read on www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/civil-unrest/the-next-french-revolution-is-it-beginning/

God help us if working class Americans get fed up with being constantly thrown under the bus by our corrupt politicians.

5 Ways a Wealth Tax Is At Least as Bad as an Income Tax | Mises Wire

There has been an increasing push for wealth taxes as of late. Supporters for new and larger wealth taxes contend that as the population ages, there won’t be enough wage earners to fund the public purse. In other words, there will be less wage-based income to tax as time goes on.
— Read on mises.org/wire/5-ways-wealth-tax-least-bad-income-tax

The song Taxman by the Beatles comes to mind

The LEI is the Means to an End to in the Hunt for Global Taxation | Armstrong Economics

QUESTION: Hi Marty, I wanted to ask you if you know anything about the LEI (legal entity identifier) that brokers are now requesting from clients who trade forex and other derivatives and who have accounts under a business structure? I recently opened a trading account under a business structure (company/trust) and was only told yesterday I have a month to get an LEI (which I have to pay for myself and renew every year) otherwise I cant trade. I have tried to gather info on it but there is only limited info and it is mainly info from the perspective of the reporting entities (such as brokers) and virtually nothing from the traders perspective. It seems like something that has been imposed by the EU. I was wondering if you have also had to obtain an LEI? Cheers D ANSWER: A Legal Entity Identifier (or LEI) is a 20-character identifier that identifies distinct legal entities that engage in financial transactions. The LEI is a global standard, designed to be non-proprietary data that is freely accessible to all so they can track what entities are doing worldwide. More than 600,000 legal entities have registered from 195 countries. This was created as a consequence of the 2007-2008 Financial Crisis. It is interesting how all governments manage to expropriate more power and control with each financial crisis. It was the CDOs created by Goldman Sachs which blew up the world just as the Black & Schol models in options blew up the financial world back in 1998 with the Long Term Capital Management crisis. But the legal entities that have created these catastrophes are NEVER punished. Not a single entity lost its license and not a single director ever when to jail. The people who blow-up the world are always UNTOUCHABLE and the rest of us lose our rights and freedom in the process. The argument back during the 2007-2009 financial crisis was that there was no way to identify corporations and financial institutions to recognize the counterpart corporation on financial transactions. Therefore, the GOVERNMENTS could not figure it out while the counterparties knew who they were dealing with and accepted their credit position. Accordingly, it was impossible for governments to identify the transaction details and track the money flows of individual corporations and institutions. Governments argued they needed a simple identification method of everyone in the world. In 2011, the G20 (Group of Twenty) called on the Financial Stability Board (FSB) to provide recommendations for a global Legal Entity Identifier (LEI). They wanted a cross-border entity to track everyone in the world. This led to the development of the Global LEI System which began issuing these LEIs to create a unique identification of legal entities acting within the entire world economy. The G20 claims this is necessary so they can know the total risk amount in a crisis. However, the G20 is still incapable of estimating individual corporations’ and the financial institution’s amount of total risk exposure. They are incompetent when it comes to analyzing risks across the entire global marketplace. They cannot even resolve the failing financial institutions in Europe because of local regulation that prevents cross-border solutions within the Eurozone. The G20 blames this lack of knowledge was one of the factors that made it difficult for the early detection of the financial crisis, they will NEVER act to prevent anything in the first place. Adding more regulation simply reduces liquidity and shrinks the world economy. The G20, in response to these inabilities of financial institutions to identify organisations uniquely, claim that was the problem so that their solution was that financial transactions in different national jurisdictions can be fully tracked. Currently, the ROC (Regulatory Oversight Committee), a coalition of financial regulators and central banks across the country, cannot possibly act in advance for they fail to comprehend the dynamics of the world economy. Hence, this is just another means of collecting data to be able to hunt for global taxation.
— Read on www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/taxes/the-lei-is-the-means-to-an-end-to-in-the-hunt-for-global-taxation/

Never let a good crisis go to waste. More regulations, fees,and hidden taxes follow every crisis.