15 Of The Largest Cargo Ships In The World Create More Emissions Than All 750 Million Cars In The World | Disclose.tv

Cargo ships are one of the most common methods of transportation for goods all over the world. Every day millions of the clothes, tech, and toys that fill the shelves in shopping centers are shipped across the oceans. In fact, about nine out of 10 items are shipped halfway around the world on…
— Read on www.disclose.tv/15-of-the-largest-cargo-ships-in-the-world-create-more-emissions-than-all-750-million-cars-in-the-364049

If Climate Change Is Killing Us, Why Is Life Expectancy Increasing? | Mises Wire

According to a recent report from the Centers for Disease Control (“Mortality in the United States, 2017”), “Life expectancy for the U.S.
— Read on mises.org/wire/if-climate-change-killing-us-why-life-expectancy-increasing

Now there is a conundrum for the carbon taxes. JohnBarleycorn

Global Warming Has Nothing to Do with the Sun? | Armstrong Economics

Those who have come forward and presented evidence the sun is the leading cause of global warming have been typically silenced because that results produces no pot of endless government grants to justify taxes. It is interesting that while they claim use sunscreen because you can get skin cancer from the sun when it comes to global warming, the sun has nothing to do with it. 10 YEARS AGO TODAY on December 13th, Al Gore Predicted North Pole Would Be COMPLETELY ICE-FREE in Five Years! The problem we face is that when there is an endless pot of money available, people will say whatever it takes to get their hands on it. Every spending bill in Congress needs an economic study to make some bogus claim. I was told to be a good boy. Pump out studies to support legislation and would earn millions per year. I declined the offer. I said I actually enjoy the research following the breadcrumbs to see where they lead. I guess when you can trade and make money it eliminates those types of temptations.
— Read on www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/climate/global-warming-has-nothing-to-do-with-the-sun/

Clash between Catastrophe and Uniformity – The Global Warming Conspiracy | Armstrong Economics

Woolly Rhinoceros Climate Change has existed throughout the history of our planet. When a Wool;y Rino was discovered frozen in Siberia intact back in 1774, that is the event that shook the scientific community. I have called this the Clash between Catastrophe and Uniformity which has produced an emotional issue corrupting scientific research for centuries as people try to create research that supports what they want to believe rather than what actually takes place. The idea that systems just collapse in a catastrophic manner can be disquieting to say the least. For this reason, uniformitarianism soothes the senses and brings order to the future dominated by uncertainty. All the analysis put out by the Global Warming conspiracy is simply a linear progression that projects a warming trend without any diversion – whereas no such trend can ever be identified in physics. This always ignores nature and the cyclical aspect of everything around us. Yet, these two clashing schools of thought that lie at the core of just about everything from the Big Bang to Charles Darwin’s (1809-1882) Theory of Evolution, began with the discovery first in 1772 near Vilui, Siberia of an intact frozen Woolly Rhinoceros followed by the more famous discovery of a frozen Mammoth in 1787. You may be shocked, but these discoveries of frozen animals with grass still in their stomach, set in motion these two schools of thought since the evidence implied you could be eating lunch and suddenly find yourself frozen to be discovered by posterity. Siberian Unicorn There was yet a third animal known as the Siberian Unicorn which also roamed the region and is extinct today.In a recent study of Siberian Unicorn bone specimens were dated, which confirmed that the species actually survived until perhaps as late as 35,000 years ago. What killed it off was not humans, but Climate Change. True, it roams the world alongside early modern humans and Neanderthals. However, the Siberian Unicorn appears to have been wiped out as the Little Ice Age came and the decline in temperature led to an increase in the amount of frozen ground. Because it was a grass eater, its food supply ceased to exist. The Woolly Rhino was more diverse in its died so it managed to survive a bit longer and eventually became extinct 20,000 years later. It was this discovery of the Wooly Rhino which changed science. Suddenly, the idea of cycles was born. This I attribute to the school of what I call the catastrophists who would claim greater influence in the birth of the field of physics and then changed the entire course of science. This is what the Global Warming Conspiracy ignores. They have effectively rejected all the important discoveries including that of Sir Isaac Newton (1642-1727) who developed his laws of gravity and was inspired by his friend to publish the work who underwrote the project, Edmund Halley (1656-1742). This was the same Halley who discovered the cyclical nature of comets. Halley believed that the comet that carries his name was the same comet reappearing throughout history at regular intervals recorded by contemporary historians of all ages. The discovery of these frozen animals opened the minds of these men who suddenly saw the world was by no means linear. Halley saw hidden within history, the same periodic intervals of a comet. Christiaan Huygens (1629-1695) discovered that light traveled not in a uniform motion as a straight line, but in a cyclical pulsating motion of cyclical waves, albeit at a constant speed. Suddenly, there could be a steady uniformity to the speed of light, yet simultaneously, there was a violent swing of extremes within it taking place in a cyclical manner. This was the same pattern that emerged in the ice core samples – the 300-year cycle to the energy output of the sun. There may appear to be uniformity in the macro world, but cyclical violent swings at the micro level that could erupt catastrophically are what we must explore OBJECTIVELY and not put out linear progressions such as Global Warming. The one thing we can bet on is that we do not live on a planet where climate has been linear.
— Read on www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/climate/clash-between-catastrophe-and-uniformity-the-global-warming-conspiracy/

This is all a ruse for the implementation of the carbon tax. Bankrupt governments are searching for yet more revenue and control.

We Were Supposed to be Resorting to Cannibalism by Now from Global Warming | Armstrong Economics

Despite the forecasts 20 years ago that snow would be a thing of the past, the last three winters have been getting progressively colder and nastier. Back in 1975, Newsweek predicted we were going into a new ice age until it became profitable to flip it into global warming to justify new taxes. Back in 1971, Stanford University professor Paul Ehrlich who wrote in 1968 his book The Population Bomb, forecast that by the end of the millennium in 2000, “the United Kingdom will be simply a small group of impoverished islands, inhabited by some 70 million hungry people.” He forecast that England will not exist in the year 2000. He later perhaps saw where the money was and flipped his forecast to catastrophic global warming. He then forecasts we would be resorting to cannibalism. Now the UK faces COLDEST winter for the DECADE with heavy, early snowfall threatening to blanket the nation by Christmas. The interesting crisis we face is the overregulation which has raised the production cost of wheat in the United States and Australia. Australia used to be the cheapest place to grow wheat but as the environmentalists have dominated the regulations, the cheapest cost of producing wheat has shifted to Ukraine and Russia. We are totally unprepared for global cooling and we should be stockpiling grain reserves NOW!!!!
— Read on www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/climate/we-were-supposed-to-be-resorting-to-cannibalism/

Oops they were wrong again

You Cannot Understand Global Warming without understanding the Second Law of Thermodynamics | Armstrong Economics

COMMENT: Mr. Armstrong; I came across this guy Richard Lindzen and it struck me he was asking people the same question about the Second Law of Thermodynamics. He concluded that very few people who appear to be scientists or educated can even answer the question but still profound to be experts on Global Warming. It is impossible to argue for Global Warming if you cannot even describe what is the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Thank you for opening our minds. HW REPLY: Yes you are absolutely correct. I assume you are referring to a comment I have made at WEC events about a major public corporation directed its Chief Financial Officer to meet with me after he lost probably 10% of the company’s funds on currency. I met with the CFO and of course, it was hostile at first. He had to acknowledge our track record but he rebutted that every single forecast for 20 years could have been coincidence or luck. When I saw it was really going nowhere but I sensed he was not a smart-ass of stupid, I asked him what was his background. He hesitated and lowered his voice to reply he went to school and had a degree in nuclear physics. I said great – “Let’s now look at the markets from the perspective of the Second Law of Thermodynamics!” It may have taken him all of 15 seconds for his mouth to drop and out came the words – OMG, there has to be a cycle! I said absolutely! This is the entire problem with the Global Warming crowd. They have bogus data only back to the second half of the 1800s and they have ZERO comprehension of the dynamics of the system. Then you have people like Al Gore preaching on a subject in which he has never even taken a course in school yet knows everything there is to know. Welcome to the new world order where these people have determined the best way to save the planet is to eliminate humans. They are working hard on trying to figure out how to accomplish that without standing trial for genocide. Just in case they do not understand what that word means the definition = the deliberate killing of a large group of people. In their case, anyone in the industrialized world.
— Read on www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/climate/you-cannot-understand-global-warming-without-understanding-the-second-law-of-thermodynamics/

Canada Global Warming Tax up to $1,000 per Household? | Armstrong Economics

I have been warning that Global Warming is profitable for governments. They paid these academics $1 billion to come up with dire forecasts that ignore nature, cycles, and history, all to justify taxing people that will never actually impact anything nor balance their budgets. Canadian households in Alberta, Saskatchewan and Nova Scotia will be hit with more than $1,000 of carbon tax per year, while those in British Columbia, Quebec and Manitoba will pay around $650. In Canada, where it is often very cold, up to 10% of someone’s income is already going to cover energy costs. Politicians have discovered a new source of revenue and they are NOT about to listen to any evidence to the contrary. At the bug environmental conference in Paris, they outright DENIED any right of any speaker to put on a contrary view. This is all despite the fact that over 30,000 people have signed a petition against Global Warming, which has been ignored as usual. Any opposition is simply ignored or silenced. Why not, there is too much money on the table for governments to just ignore. Guess it will definitely now be cheaper to retire to the Caribbean. You won’t have to pay $1,000 a year to heat your home.
— Read on www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/taxes/canada-global-warming-tax-up-to-1000-per-household/

Global warming hoax has always been about more revenue for government