Pocahontas to Run for President | Armstrong Economics

The stage has been set and Elizabeth Warren, aka Pocahontas, is to Run for President. What is going to be really interesting besides her becoming more vocal now for the next two years, will be the revelation of how corrupt she really is. She has bashed the banks and is the closest thing to a full-fledged Marxist in the Democratic Party so will the like of Goldman Sachs fill her purse with money to defeat Trump? We all know about the claim Warren made to get into Harvard Law School back in the 90s claiming she was a Native American. She claimed that she was pointing to “family stories” passed down to her through generations as evidence. Harvard had singled her out claiming she was a leading Native American student. Warren later acknowledged that she had listed herself as a minority in an Association of American Law Schools directory. Warren maintains she never furthered her career by using her heritage to gain advantage. Then analysis from Carlos Bustamante, a professor of genetics at Stanford and an adviser to Ancestry, said: “While the vast majority of the individual’s ancestry is European,” he concluded of Warren, “the results strongly support the existence of an unadmixed Native American ancestor in the individual’s pedigree, likely in the range of 6-10 generations ago.” So if there was some involvement 6 to 10 generations prior, it is hard to see why someone would have the audacity to even claim she was Native American. In the process, her release of a DNA test that suggesting such a distant a lineage to a Native American ancestor sparked outrage among real Native Americans who felt she was using such a weak cultural and social ties for political gain. It just seems disingenuous to claim someone who is a blue-eyed blond is Native American with such a distant connection. Sure, in my distant past, on my father’s mother side was married to a German in the late 1600s in New Amsterdam before it became New York City. I probably have as much German in me or more than Warren has Native American going that far back.
— Read on www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/politics/pocahontas-to-run-for-president/

Trump paid $130K to Daniels – Clinton paid $350k to Jones | Armstrong Economics

Paula Corbin Jones was the former Arkansas state employee who sued U.S. President Bill Clinton for sexual harassment. He paid her $350,000 to keep quiet and Trump paid his own money $130,000 to Stormy Daniels – the porn star. And the Democrats want to impeach Trump for that when Clinton has a history of hitting on the girls that work in government with him.
— Read on www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/politics/trump-paid-130k-to-daniels-clinton-paid-350k-to-jones/

Moral double standard

Truth News Headlines January 6, 2019

The Democrats control only a small fraction of the government. They are essentially powerless. The only thing that has changed is the have a little bigger microphone 🎙.

Unknown's avatarAmerican Intelligence Media

Manufacturers under Trump had best year for jobs since ’97

trump bringing industry back.

dishonored her family.

dishonored bannerrashida burka

Does this mean Muslim women around the world can disregard Sharia and let their hair down in public? Does this mean that Muslim men are no longer in charge of their women-cattle? Congratulations, Rashida, for talking trash and tossing the hijab! Your Muslim brothers and sisters must be very proud of you.

.

If the Democrat’s are really serious about putting a truly representative member of their Party forward in 2020, they must choose Rashida Tlaib. To not do so will be sexist, Islamaphobic and not loyal to their core message.

— Dennis Miller (@DennisDMZ) January 4, 2019

 .

Migrant crisis: Illegal entries to EU at lowest level in five years

.

“He’s DESTROYING FRANCE” Nigel Farage EXPOSES Emmanuel Macron with Le Pen

.

Pictures: Yellow Vests Return to Paris to Protest Macron’s Globalist Government

.

View original post 1,384 more words

Why Do Some People Feel More Pain Than Others?

Anyone who came of age in the 1990s remembers the “Friends” episode where Phoebe and Rachel venture out to get tattoos. Spoiler alert: Rachel gets a tattoo and Phoebe ends up with a black ink dot because she couldn’t take the pain. This sitcom storyline is funny, but it also simply illustrates the question that I and many others in the field of “pain genetics” are trying to answer. What is it about Rachel that makes her different from Phoebe? And, more importantly, can we harness this difference to help the “Phoebes” of the world suffer less by making them more like the “Rachels”?

— Read on curiosity.com/topics/why-do-some-people-feel-more-pain-than-others-curiosity