This post/analysis in 2014 stands the test of time. We have pulled out and highlighted the “even one share” portion of the judicial rules on disclosing conflicts that Amy Berman Jackson is so flagrantly violating. To those that think our recent posts about all the financial conflicts from the swamp bottom feeders are ‘much to do about nothing’, think again.

Even ONE SHARE must be disclosed.

It’s not illegal to own the shares, but our politicians MUST disclose this info….and judges must recuse themselves with even ONE SHARE of conflict. To date, they haven’t done diddly squat except lie, lie, and lie again. Oh yeah…and fill their offshore bank accounts from the gains of illegal activities.

What about all those Supreme Court judges that owned Facebook stock when they were ruling on Leader Technology’s patent case? They enhanced the surveillance state using technology that was not theirs, but the SCOTUS…